STAY INSPIRED

Sign up for 3DSPRO Newsletter and get InSpiration with our content, news and exclusive offers.

How to Design Interlocking Parts for 3D Printing

Engineer Guide
  • 00003botton3DSPRO Engineer
  • 00005bottonDec. 23 | 2025
  • 00002botton Engineer Guide
  • 00001botton5 Minutes Read
  • 21 clicks

     

    Understanding Interlocking Parts

     

    Interlocking parts are components designed to connect or fit together in a way that prevents separation without deliberate force or motion. They rely on geometry, friction, or mechanical features to hold assemblies together.

     

    Benefits of Interlocking Parts

     

    • Ease of assembly: No need for glue, screws, or external fasteners.

    • Reusability: Parts can be disassembled and reused.

    • Functionality: Enables moving mechanisms like hinges or sliding rails.

    • Customization: Modular systems allow users to mix and match components.

     

    Applications

     

    Consumer products: Toys, puzzles, modular organizers.

    • Engineering prototypes: Snap-fit housings, enclosures, and mechanical joints.

    • Architecture and design: Scaled models with modular connections.

    • Furniture and decor: Flat-pack designs that lock together without tools.

     

    how-to-design-interlocking-parts-for-3d-printing

     

    Image Copyright © 3DSPRO Limited. All rights reserved.

     

    Key Design Considerations

     

    1. Material Choice

     

    • Thermoplastics (FDM): PLA (rigid), ABS (tough, flexible), PETG (balanced), TPU (elastic).

    Resins (SLA/DLP): High precision, smooth surfaces, but brittle unless using toughened resins.

    Powder polymers (SLS/MJF): Nylon (PA12, PA11) offers strength, flexibility, and durability.

    Metals (SLM/DMLS): Stainless steel, titanium, aluminum, extremely strong but require larger tolerances due to shrinkage and post-processing.

     

    2. Printer Capabilities

     

    • FDM: Resolution limited by nozzle size; tolerances ~0.2–0.5 mm.

    • SLA/DLP: Very high resolution; tolerances ~0.1–0.2 mm.

    • SLS/MJF: Good accuracy for functional parts; tolerances ~0.2–0.4 mm.

    • Metal powder-bed fusion: Shrinkage and heat distortion require ~0.5–1 mm clearance.

     

    3. Strength vs. Flexibility

     

    • Plastics: Balance between rigidity and elasticity.

    • Resins: Precise but brittle unless reinforced.

    • Polymers (nylon): Excellent fatigue resistance for repeated interlocks.

    • Metals: Strongest, but interlocks must account for machining or finishing.

     

    4. Print Orientation

     

    • FDM: Layer adhesion affects snap-fit strength.

    • SLA: Orientation impacts support removal and surface finish.

    • SLS/MJF: Orientation is less critical, but affects powder removal.

    • Metal fusion: Orientation impacts residual stress and post-machining.

     

    Designing for Tolerances


    Typical Tolerance Ranges

     

    Technology

    Clearance Range

    Notes

    FDM

    0.2–0.5 mm

    Depends on nozzle size and calibration

    SLA/DLP

    0.1–0.2 mm

    High precision, but resin brittleness matters

    SLS/MJF

    0.2–0.4 mm

    Nylon parts allow flexible fits

    Metal (SLM/DMLS)

    0.5–1 mm

    Accounts for shrinkage, heat distortion, and post-machining

     

    Strategies

     

    • Test prints: Calibration pieces with varying clearances.

    • Iterative design: Adjust based on results.

    • Parametric CAD: Easily modify tolerances.

    • Post-processing: Sanding, machining, or polishing to refine fits.

     

    Types of Interlocking Mechanisms

     

    1. Snap-Fit Joints

     

    • Plastics (FDM, SLS): Flexible arms or hooks.

    • Resins (SLA): Possible but brittle—use reinforced geometries.

    • Metals: Rare due to rigidity; better suited for sliding or bolted interlocks.

     

    2. Rotational Locks

     

    • Hinges: Common in plastics and resins.

    • Twist-to-lock: Effective in polymers and metals with larger tolerances.

     

    3. Sliding Interlocks

     

    • Dovetail joints: Excellent for nylon (SLS/MJF) and metals.

    • Rails and grooves: Work across all technologies, but require tolerance tuning.

     

    4. Puzzle-Style Connections

     

    • Geometric interlocks: Best in high-precision SLA or nylon SLS.

    • Decorative assemblies: Ideal for resin-based printing.

     

    5. Hybrid Mechanisms

    • Combining sliding with snap-fit for added security.

    • Example: Nylon dovetail with a flexible latch.

     

    CAD Design Best Practices

     

    1. Use Parametric Modeling

    • Allows easy adjustment of tolerances and dimensions.

    • Facilitates iterative testing without rebuilding models.

     

    2. Add Chamfers and Fillets

    • Chamfers: Help guide parts into place.

    • Fillets: Reduce stress concentrations and improve durability.

     

    3. Consider Assembly Direction

    • Design interlocks to assemble in one direction.

    • Avoid requiring complex maneuvers that frustrate users.

     

    4. Account for Print Orientation

    • Align interlocking features with layer lines for strength.

    • Minimize support material in critical areas.

     

    5. Prototype Digitally

    • Use CAD simulations to test the assembly before printing.

    • Check for interference or impossible geometries.

     

    6. Document Design Parameters

    • Record tolerance values, material choices, and orientation.

    • Helps future iterations and collaboration.

     

    Common Mistakes to Avoid

     

    1. Ignoring Printer Limitations

    • Designing features smaller than the printer can resolve.

    • Solution: Match design detail to printer resolution.

     

    2. Forgetting Shrinkage and Warping

    • Materials like ABS shrink after cooling.

    • Solution: Adjust dimensions or use materials with low shrinkage.

     

    3. Overcomplicating Interlocks

    • Complex geometries may be unnecessary.

    • Solution: Start simple—snap-fit or dovetail joints often suffice.

     

    4. Neglecting Ergonomics

    • Interlocks that require excessive force frustrate users.

    • Solution: Design for ease of assembly and disassembly.

     

    5. Skipping Test Prints

    • Assuming tolerances will work without testing.

    • Solution: Always print calibration pieces before final designs.

     

    6. Poor Orientation Choices

    • Printing interlocks in weak directions leads to breakage.

    • Solution: Orient parts to maximize strength along stress lines.

     

    Check out Our Special Offers
    Featuring Process
    Featuring Materials
    COMMENTS
    • Be the first to share your thoughts!
    Cookie Policy

    3DSPRO collect cookies on your computer to provide more personalized services to you. By using this website, you consent to the cookies we use and our Privacy Policy

    Accept